Sat Aug 29, 2015 5:21 pm
I can see the argument for both players. McLain was a "disappointment", with a 24-9, 2.80 ERA after his killer 31-6, 1.96 in 1968. Cuellar, meanwhile, was 23-11, 2.38 for the 109 win Orioles. Modern-day voters would have given a ton of support for Sam McDowell at 18-14, 2.94 with 285 K's for the 62-99 Indians.