SP/Reliever as "Closer"?
12 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
by Valen » Fri Apr 09, 2010 3:17 pm
I go with the guy with the good C rating as a priority. Never won in 200x without that but have won 2001 championships with a 0.50 price closer who was a C6. For the life of me I cannot remember that guys name. I think he was the Toronto closer that year but would not bet on it.
- Valen
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
by artie4121 » Sat May 29, 2010 3:10 am
I'm always learning here from those who are smarter than me (not a tough task).
I have never designed a NON R/C to the "closer role," because I thought HAL would avoid using him.
I do understand that the "N" rating is asking for trouble, BUT can I assume that with the designation of "Do not use before the 9th inning" coupled with "Quick hook," that a very good R1, R2 or R3 with NO Closer rating could be just as effective for that one inning than a similar quality R/C?
I have never designed a NON R/C to the "closer role," because I thought HAL would avoid using him.
I do understand that the "N" rating is asking for trouble, BUT can I assume that with the designation of "Do not use before the 9th inning" coupled with "Quick hook," that a very good R1, R2 or R3 with NO Closer rating could be just as effective for that one inning than a similar quality R/C?
- artie4121
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm
12 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests