NEW STRAT KEEPER LEAGUE

ATHLETICS ROSTER CHANGE

Postby CaliENGR » Wed Apr 18, 2012 10:59 pm

The Pacifica, CA Athletics promote RP Jordan Walden from the prospect roster to the active 40 man roster which was at 39 because of the uneven trade with Neil (Danville).
CaliENGR
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Trade

Postby joker329 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 4:55 am

JohnThen trades prospect picks 5 and 12 to joker for 2013 FA rd 5 pick and 2013 prospect pick #2
joker329
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Trade

Postby minntwin11 » Thu Apr 19, 2012 5:53 am

I confirm the trade with Joker
minntwin11
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby bvargus » Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:42 am

I don't qwuite understand why my team, and anyone else who traded away a prospect pick, ends up with fewer picks. It should be just like the free agent draft, where if you trade a first round pick you end up with an extra one in round 16, so you still get the same number of players.
So I traded away a pick with the expectation that I would get a third pick in the 4th round. That's how I read the rule, which states...
[quote:8565f9d231] Each team will be able to select 3 prospects, [/quote:8565f9d231]
..But I only got two.
bvargus
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby peterdouglas38 » Sun Apr 22, 2012 1:29 am

I got your back, Billy. I don't know why you didn't have a third pick either.
peterdouglas38
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby RUSSIMLER » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:12 am

I guess I've always read it the other way. Since the roster requires a 40 man roster, to me that implied that you had to make picks until you reached your roster size. You aren't required to have a certain minimum of prospects, so I always assumed that when you traded a prospect pick it was gone.

Losing the pick makes it a lot more valuable.....opposite if you get a...what would you call it...final prospect pick at the end of the draft.

Maybe after the season we need a rules review? The league is several years old, and if nothing else some clarification of some points could be in order. Obviously it would have to be after the 2nd season.
RUSSIMLER
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby TefJ » Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:15 pm

Billy,

You were able to draft 3 prospects. You chose to trade that ability for something else. Also, If we were to go by your interpretation of the rule, we would have to go through and cut any prospects above 3 that anyone drafted, which would make trading prospect picks much more confusing and undesirable.

I don't understand why you thought it would work the way you say, since both of our previous prospect drafts have been 3 rounds, with trades working exactly the way they did in this draft.

I think Russ' idea is great, we can clean up the language of stuff like this (change it to 3 rounds), and debate what works and what doesn't. It would also give us an opportunity to make some changes, since, when we started, most of us didn't know how it would play out (some people want to promote prospects instead of picks or keep 35 players, etc).
TefJ
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby bvargus » Sun Apr 22, 2012 10:01 pm

I'm good with the idea of reviewing after the season. That is, if anyone remembers at that point...
bvargus
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Postby RUSSIMLER » Mon Apr 23, 2012 10:05 am

We could schedule an owners' meeting in Hawaii in January.
RUSSIMLER
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

Never too early

Postby peterdouglas38 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 11:57 pm

I am willing to listen on all offers for MLB players:)
peterdouglas38
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:34 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Individual League Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests